Hmm, what about the Deaf user(s)?

And the point of this article was?

Something considered on the opportunities for the cognitively disabled in the light of rich semantics of Web 2.0 might match with the title - but since 80% of developers can't be arsed adding alt tags, who are we kidding anyway.

Its far from the most interesting of stuff going on in accessibility in any case .... I suppose it would be too much to hope for some coverage of the horrors of WCAG2... or how WAI has gone to hell in a IBM handcart.

These accessibility issues and solutions have been around for years .. what exactly was the point of this article??