The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Comments on: Arrest Richard Gere, orders Indian court

3 Months ? 

Posted Thursday 26th April 2007 14:52 GMT

Damn ,.. Should of at least made it worth it and practiced "The Goose"

Understanding of foreign culture 

Posted Thursday 26th April 2007 15:41 GMT

In such a global community where tolerance and respect regardless of merit, of another persons view point, religious indoctrination and culture is so important. Why is it that western culture is not respected in the East? Not that I see a great deal to respect btw.

However it is acceptable (arguably) in Western society for Mr Gere to behave the way he did. It was entirely the responsibility of Ms Shetty to slap his face if she thought he was out of order.

Now where is the tolerance to other culture (OK in this instance decadent Western culture) when we see effigies burned in the street, and calls for the arrest and presumably punishment for what was after all to western eyes, an innocent bit of fun or a dirty old man trying it on.

Personally I feel a bit sick of being the only one doing any kind of tolerating. And if such behavior actually broke Indian law, then it's time for some legislative revision in my own humble, liberated and tolerant opinion.

huh? 

Posted Thursday 26th April 2007 16:01 GMT

"an outrage against her modesty and an affront to Indian culture"

you mean the same culture that brought me my copy of the karma sutra? yes they are a shy and reserved nation.

another example 

Posted Thursday 26th April 2007 16:30 GMT

Another example of repressive and regressive attitudes regarding women. Apparently, as regards the Judge and those who would bring these charges, women are always and only considered in a sexual context - would that Indian women would realize the power of 'crossed legs'.

If ... 

Posted Thursday 26th April 2007 16:33 GMT

... kissing is an outrage then what is pretending to burn humans?

Afghanistan, 2000 

Posted Thursday 26th April 2007 17:56 GMT

Of course, if they had been in Afghanistan in 2000, she'd be stoned and he'd be beheaded.

BTW, anybody ever seen any of the friezes in the Indian temples. Makes Hustler look kind of plain.

Do the Right Thing 

Posted Thursday 26th April 2007 17:56 GMT

"...what is pretending to burn humans": the Right Thing to do in an age where religious fascists demand AND GET as much respect as those really worthy of emulation. We're sitting in a pile of dung of our own making. Repeat after me: I will not tolerate the intolerant...

Radical? 

Posted Thursday 26th April 2007 18:04 GMT

Might those be them radical nationalist Hindu brothers? Make no mistake, they are the Real Stuff. Running bloody pogroms against local Muslim minorities is one of their favorite pastimes. Will Richard have to get ready for the Hindu equivalent of a fatwa?

Well if they can... 

Posted Thursday 26th April 2007 18:04 GMT

"... kissing is an outrage then what is pretending to burn humans?"

I agree, let's find pictures of this so called judge, staple them to some straw effigies that are vaguely human shaped and traipse around various towns with them on fire... if "they" attempt to oppress us, we'll just accuse them of being racist.

Repression 

Posted Thursday 26th April 2007 18:11 GMT

"Another example of repressive and regressive attitudes regarding women"

Yeah, that's why they're arresting a man and burning effigies of him.

This is repression of sexuality in general, not any particular gender. They're terrified by the idea that someone can freely practice what they aren't allowed by their traditions and/or religion.

"repeated kisses on Shetty's cheeks" 

Posted Thursday 26th April 2007 18:25 GMT

And who can blame him for getting a bit out of control with la Shetty?

Being of the old fart persuasion myself I can easily see the temptation. (lucky sod).

One rule for us, another for them? 

Posted Thursday 26th April 2007 18:53 GMT

Why is it we expect people from other countries and cultures who come to live in our country to live as we do, abide by our laws and have the same social values as we do, yet when another country has laws which conflict with our views we think they should be changed?

No I don't particular agree with this particular law in India, to me it seems quite silly, but that's not the point. In India it's the law, and the responsibility is on the person entering that country to understand, respect and abide by those laws.

After all, consider a more extream example. The age of consent differs around the world, commonly from between 14 and 18 (while some are lower there tends to be stipulations that both partners are of similar ages). If someone (I'm assuming an adult for this) from a country where the age of consent is 14 came to the UK, and had sex with a 14 year old girl, should that person be arrested for statutory rape as is our law, or let off because in their home country it's OK?

Mr Gere should in theory have known better, after all ignorance isn't a defense, though I think it could certainly be argued that Ms Shetty should have known better, and stopped it from happening.

No kissing cheeks.. 

Posted Thursday 26th April 2007 18:55 GMT

But we're fine with falsely accusing your wife of adultery, burning her alive and hooking up with someone else.

Tolerant societies like this deserve nothing but our deepest respect.

And yes, adnim is bang on saying we are hammered when we don't respect the cultural behaviour of other societies, but are never given the same courtesy in return.

Often we don't deserve much courtesy, and we did fuck over most of what we called the 3rd world (developing nations). But while people like Richard Gere may live in their own artificial Hollywood worlds, at least they do try to make up for the wrongs visited on poorer nations.

They try to highlight genocide, disease, hunger and poverty. They try to make a difference. A lot of what they do might be bollox, but at least they try to do the right thing.

He was there to help their fight against Aids, and his reward for not understanding their culture was to be sentenced to 3 months in jail. I know there's more than a few people in India with a significantly more tolerant outlook on life, so perhaps they could help right this stupidity.

I don't even tolerate my OWN cultural 'values' 

Posted Thursday 26th April 2007 20:47 GMT

This reminds me of that time when Janet Jackson had that wardrobe malfunction. Unlike this, it was claimed to be an 'accident', and yet look at how America overreacted.

It's embarrassing.

And India...wasn't that the culture where widows were expected to burn with their husband's corpse before the British took over? And how's that caste system working out?

Seriously, there is a great deal of value in the culture of India that is worthy of respect, but there is also a great deal broken. No culture is perfect, and we need to be able to discuss our cultures in something other than absolutes.

"He was there to help their fight against Aids, and his reward for not understanding their culture was to be sentenced to 3 months in jail. I know there's more than a few people in India with a significantly more tolerant outlook on life, so perhaps they could help right this stupidity."

I agree.

Finally, there are some who say ignorance of the law is not an excuse. However, at this point the legal systems in industrialized nations is such that really the only people who are not ignorant of the law are lawyers, and we've seen how much better the people who can afford good legal counsel do in court compared to those who cannot.

In short, if ignorance of the law is not an excuse (or a defense), then only the wealthy will be able to work within it.

....because 

Posted Friday 27th April 2007 00:35 GMT

>Why is it we expect people from other countries and cultures who

>come to live in our country to live as we do, abide by our laws and

>have the same social values as we do, yet when another country has >laws which conflict with our views we think they should be changed?

Think about it some more. It's because we're consistent in the laws and values that we think should be followed.

What would be an issue were if we said "No stoning" or whatever in our country and then fawned some false respect for people that stone folk to death elsewhere. Diplomacy and jurisdiction notwithstanding what we can actually say and do about it when it happens of course [or, in other words, if they've got oil or more weapons then, well, c'est la vie.]

That said, Shilpa, Gere and Goody all share the fact they come from countries where the populace sat on their arse and waited until someone else turned it into a place worth living and running.

But, yeah, Indian laws should be heeded if you're there because otherwise you might get arrested. But if the law is, in your opinion a load of rubbish then there's no requirement to pretend otherwise when stating that opinion, is there? Not unless you're the typical character.brought to life by Michael Palin perhaps "Stoning you to death? You lucky bastard! They must love you! If being tied to a tree for 14 years without food or water has taught me anything, it's respect for the Indians"

Shetty Situation 

Posted Friday 27th April 2007 08:50 GMT

I'm thinking that Shetty/Gere would only have to avoid the Indian state of Rajasthan. I can't imagine any of the more enlightened states extraditing them for this "crime".

Be civil 

Posted Friday 27th April 2007 10:49 GMT

"and duly "burned and kicked straw effigies of Gere and Shetty" in protests across India."

Ah yes, the mark of a truely civilised people it is not.

I say to all those who have outsourced to India, get the hell out NOW!!!!!!

i would, wouldn't you 

Posted Friday 27th April 2007 12:36 GMT

If i was to get the chance of a "kiss" or two from a looker like Shilpa at the age i am now, let alone 60+ i'd do 3 months and smile the whole time!!

"Ignorance of the law is no defence" 

Posted Friday 27th April 2007 12:45 GMT

I used to understand and almost agree with that rule. If you murder someone and didn't know it was illegal, tough. If you steal something and didn't know, tough. Live by the 10 commandments, 4 precepts, or other similar-ish guidelines, then in my mind you've got nothing to worry about. Common-sense should prevent any problems with the law.

But because travel is soo easy these days. It's trivial to get on a plane, go to a different country, and not appreciate you're truly entering a different country and culture.

So when someone is made a criminal for kissing someone - something which the rest of the world does quite happily and without restraint - I think some lenience is due.

Rings on her fingers and rings on her toes... 

Posted Friday 27th April 2007 13:26 GMT

.... she shall cause controversy where ever she goes.

Right! 

Posted Friday 27th April 2007 13:54 GMT

These are the same people that ride on the roofs of trains.

Indeed 

Posted Friday 27th April 2007 15:15 GMT

> These are the same people that ride on the roofs of trains.

Don't forget they're supporting a repressive caste system, have massive religious stampedes, protect rapists from prosecution and have a knack of ignoring child molesting and murder. I know it's a big country and this rant is far too generalising, but by Jove lads! Really.

Other thoughts 

Posted Friday 27th April 2007 20:56 GMT

Richard Gere is a self-proclaimed Buddist. As such he has a responsibility to look beyond the confines of his personal constructs. (It means he should have known better).

His responsibility now, is to return to India, accept his fate and ensure a continuation of positive karma.

It would also go a long way to demonstrate that we in the west actually have more moral fiber than those who claim vehement righteousness. It does not matter if they are wrong and we are right.

Stand up. Be a man.

Besides India would not let him rot in some backward low caste prison - he is far to famous for that. In the end, he would walk away a hero and likely ten times more popular than he is now.