2 May 2007 03:56
SlashdotDiggdel.icio.usReddit
[Mobile]

Comments on ‘The Economist de-rails Microsoft media love in’

+ More by this author

Content or Diss content?

« Back to article page

Re: Did he just say "piss off"?

By Alex
Posted Wednesday 2nd May 2007 08:06 GMT

To piss someone off means you get them angry. What does the expression mean for you crazy brits? :)

Bloody hell...

By hugh Pym
Posted Wednesday 2nd May 2007 08:24 GMT

... some sense spoken at a marketing conference? I don't know about global warming but I think hell just froze over.

Amusing Coda

By Gerry
Posted Wednesday 2nd May 2007 08:38 GMT

Apart from generally enjoying the de-bunking by the Economist, there's a little bit of history repeating itself in the concluding paragragh.

Years ago (70?), Isaac Asimov was invited to define (in effect) the e-book. He then went on to carefully describe the req'd features. From a different direction he came to the same conclusion as Rassbass.

Timely comments

By Tom
Posted Wednesday 2nd May 2007 09:57 GMT

It always amazes me that people working with technology don't understand that not everyone loves what they love (technology, and especially clever technology). This is a message that is repeated over and over again in the real world, in many subtle ways, but in the echo chamber of the internet it is lost.

To paraphrase Fry: clever things make people feel stupid, and new things make them feel scared.

I always did respect the Economist!

By David Norfolk
Posted Wednesday 2nd May 2007 11:11 GMT

These "heretical" remarks make a lot of sense to me - although I have been involved in a paper magazine with great (and independent) content which couldn't make any money from it....

Specialist technology magazines on paper are struggling today and online content (obviously) has its place - if it isn't "advertorial" and if it's fun to read - but I predict a return to paper magazines as premium, paid-for, adjuncts to online info sources in a year or so!

Paper will probably be marketed as "new technology" by then, of course.

If it doesn't kill you, it makes you stronger

By Martin
Posted Wednesday 2nd May 2007 12:01 GMT

Superb! Sanity in a marketing forum, sanity in Las Vegas! Is Rashbass going to kill MS's shiny new technology? - of course not. Is he going to help it be used in sensible ways? - maybe, just maybe. Microsoft should be grateful.

Techno-b*ll*cks

By Tony
Posted Wednesday 2nd May 2007 14:49 GMT

This seems reminiscent of the exposure of Vista for what it really is. For those who have become sufficiently detached from reality to think all technology is good regardless of whether it is or not, do remember that Mr Ray Mears and many others are doing very nicely thank you from teaching people to live without technology, because lots of people are keen to do this. There may be a message there somewhere....

Anyhow it is good to see people in positions of influence at last pointing out the bleedin' obvious.

What to do?

By Tom
Posted Wednesday 2nd May 2007 17:00 GMT

Just curl up with a good book, and relax in the sun by the beach on an island in the pacific.

Where do I sign up?

Another margarita please!

where do I sign ...

By Mat
Posted Thursday 3rd May 2007 10:36 GMT

As a marketing ploy for the Economist, that worked a treat! I almost feel like signing up right now for a subscription. Rarely seen/heard so much sense spoken by an individual at that type of event.

Economist technology guy gives tekkies a reality-based mauling

By Anonymous Coward
Posted Thursday 3rd May 2007 12:46 GMT

Well done to Andrew Rathbass. By reason of their own vested interests of career, personal fullfillment, stock options & corner offices, technology marketers are too often in denial of the abiding, irrevocable truth that the majority of new technologies - like the majority of brands - fail. Hype-merchants who populate the "Dilbert cubicles" in Redmond & elswhere fight to counter this truth, rather like salmon swimming upstream. For sticking his bear-like paw in the water and munching on the munchkins, Rathbass has provided a salutary - and certainly entertaining - spectacle.

PS. "Winston Binch" - A real person ? Or a character from a Martin Amis novel ? Circa "Money", I'd guess..

Calling the Pope

By John Angelico
Posted Friday 4th May 2007 09:53 GMT

He should be instantly canonised as a saint!!

Finally someone else (apart from 'chairs' Ballmer) who can put Bill Gates back into his box!

piss off?

By Paul
Posted Wednesday 9th May 2007 15:31 GMT

For Alex and the other US readers:

piss someone off - annoy them

piss off - go away (somewhat offensive when used as imperative)

pissed - drunk (I believe it means annoyed, in the USA)

Quo vadis?

By marc
Posted Tuesday 15th May 2007 12:15 GMT

I think MS has trodden its path for so long it has lost its direction. Watch Gates talking about the Kitchen of the Future as opposed to doing a great operating system, or copying its way into every possible market, and you see how MS is simply a marketing company with crappy technology, hence the proliferation of BS MS marketing consultants each etching out a justification for their own existence. Compare Apple - a tech company with great marketing - it has a direction.