Skip to content

Biting the hand that feeds IT

The Register ®

Security:

News Tools

Reg Shops

Related Whitepapers
The Register » Security »

Comments on ‘Yahoo! battered by second ActiveX vulnerability’

Upgrade averts code catastrophe

By John Leyden
Published Monday 3rd September 2007 09:16 GMT

« Back to article page

You're slipping! 

By AndyB
Posted Monday 3rd September 2007 12:52 GMT

Shouldn't the title be:-

Yahoo! battered! by! second! ActiveX! vulnerability! ?

ActiveX 

By Daniel Ballado-Torres
Posted Monday 3rd September 2007 13:25 GMT

Yahoo! doesn't! learn!

Lesson! is! stop! using! activeX!

Yahoo! battered! by! second! ActiveX! vulnerability! 

By Andy Shulman
Posted Monday 3rd September 2007 18:30 GMT

What happened to proper punctuation?

ActiveX? Ewww. Don't get any on me. 

By Jeffrey Nonken
Posted Monday 3rd September 2007 22:21 GMT

Y!M isn't using ActiveX in the OS X version, surely they can do without it under Windows?

... And if you are running Windows it's yet another reason to use a third-party instant messenger. You know, one that doesn't have quite so much stupid in it.

Everyone knows that... 

By Anonymous Coward
Posted Tuesday 4th September 2007 04:54 GMT

...ActiveX gives you teh cancer!

The period for commenting on this story has finished

whitepaper title

Webcast : Why Today's Spam Filters Fail

This webcast covers the cost of spam, how we filter spam today; why it's not good enough, and the advantages of Abaca's new ReceiverNet technology.. 		whitepaper title

The Register Guides : The status of iSCSI

Now that the hype's abated, have companies backing iSCSI have run out of energy and patience, or is the technology becoming commonplace and accepted?.

Top 20 stories • All The Week’s Headlines • Archive • Search