Skip to content

Biting the hand that feeds IT

The Register ®

Software:


Related Whitepapers

Comments on ‘SCO gets offer for Unix biz’

Enough to pay the lawyers off

Published Thursday 25th October 2007 09:19 GMT

« Back to article page

Patents - not really 

By David Haworth
Posted Thursday 25th October 2007 09:46 GMT

IIRC there wer no patents involved. Copyrights, yes, and other, stranger theories of "intellectual property" infringement, but no patents.

There must be an irony 

By cor
Posted Thursday 25th October 2007 09:55 GMT
Jobs Horns

In the fact that (outside of the merits of their copyright trolling) SCO's downfall was finally effected by their inability to pay the lawyers that they let loose on the Open Source community and other free Unix supporters. This after MicroSoft carefully and quietly retracted its (financial) support, nauseated by the odour of 'dead horse'.

Like the plot from a bad mafia film.

Cormac.

What a sorry tale 

By Dave Dowell
Posted Thursday 25th October 2007 10:07 GMT

I am saddened by the entire sorry tale of SCOs last five years. They could have found a better business model, they could have contributed, and worked it into their business, but instead decided to follow the daft idea of taking on big blue over what were always exceptionally tenuous claims, to put it mildly.

Lets hope this consortium can buy the UNIX business and make it work, if for no other reason than the poor SOBs who work for that business having a chance of keeping their jobs.

pretty weird 

By Alan Donaly
Posted Thursday 25th October 2007 10:29 GMT
Alien

I checked the York minibio page they have pictures of the execs no outward signs of tertiary syphilis or psychosis but you can do a lot with photoshop what possible use could anyone have for this old down at the heels hopelessly bit rotted code pile.Oh well several born every minute.Maybe Ballmer could buy it this sounds like his sort of deal.

"Once great company"??? 

By Dave Fox
Posted Thursday 25th October 2007 11:01 GMT
Coat

When you refer to SCO as a "once great company", you seem to forget that the Santa Cruz Operation (old SCO) of old actually sold of its Unix server biz to Caldera and renamed itself to Tarentella Inc and eventually became part of Sun.

Caldera (an ex-Linux shop!) rebranded itself as the SCO Group (new SCO). New SCO never was a great company and, by the looks of things, never will be!

Paris Hilton angle? She once appeared on the cover of Elle magazine wearing a Santa Cruz Surfing Club t-shirt. I'll get me coat.....

patent troll indeed 

By Anonymous Coward
Posted Thursday 25th October 2007 11:43 GMT
IT Angle

poetic justice that SCO filed for bankrupcy protection.

i hope they burn personally.

along with their army of laywers.

Who remembers SCO Unix? 

By Kim Hancock
Posted Thursday 25th October 2007 12:14 GMT

And so, what once was a great company becomes just a puddle on the floor.

The worst is that it's all completely self-inflicted. Greedy bastards!

bah! outbid again.. 

By Tawakalna
Posted Thursday 25th October 2007 12:51 GMT
Pirate

I offered a pound, which is several shillings more than Sco's really worth; I thought it was a fair offer, but someone's sniped me (sniff.. it's worse than eBuy)

This could only happen in the US 

By Antoinette Lacroix
Posted Thursday 25th October 2007 14:03 GMT

What kind of law let's one sell assets, before the rightful owner has been paid off ? They already owe a lot more than they have. I just can't see Novell just stand there and watch York ( Microsoft ) gain control over Unix. I say, this is going to be FUN !

Not patents - copyrights, then contracts 

By Scott Dunn
Posted Thursday 25th October 2007 15:10 GMT
Stop

Okay guys, I know your heart is in the right place, but please try to get your facts straight. First they sued IBM for trade secret breach, copyright infringement and then contracts. Eventually, they gave up on the trade secrets and patents when it was discovered that most of the unix code is "out there".

Then they gave up on the patents when it was disclosed that there were no patents transfered in the Asset Purchase Agreement of 1995.

There was also a tiny whimper about Project Monterey, but the contract for that project severely limits the options for litigation.

See www.groklaw.net for details.

Scott

Re: Not patents - copyrights, then contracts 

By john oates
Posted Thursday 25th October 2007 15:53 GMT
staff

Hi Scott,

Thanks for your comment - i've tweaked the story now to make it less wrong. This is why my sister is the lawyer in our family...

cheers

john

Got me thinking... 

By cor
Posted Thursday 25th October 2007 16:07 GMT
Boffin

Wasn't MicroSoft also squeaking about patent infringements in free unix distro's?

Is not that why they handcuffed Novell to the bed, and dragged in a few other small fry, in their "non-legitigation promise"?

So, Steve and Bill, bring it on.

Just remember, we got The GIMP*

*Gnu Image Manipulation Program (look it up, sloth!)

York web site... 

By Tony
Posted Thursday 25th October 2007 16:36 GMT
Happy

Their web site is just one big image:

http://www.yorkcapital.com/

I can imagine future versions of the OS will just be a big image map for functionality :)

Sweet.

For the past few years, SCO has been totally useless. 

By Edward Pearson
Posted Saturday 27th October 2007 12:06 GMT
Alert

I feel no sympathy for SCO. Once a great company, the past few years have seen them spent their time and all their money, investing in frivolous patent lawsuits.

When did they last release a new product?

Ok, they may or may not hold the patents for Unix, but why run a good company, with a large capital, into the ground in cases that, if you ask many experts, they were doomed to lose.

The moment a company stops innovating, and spends its time trying to rob other organizations hard earned cash (patent violations or not), then it is doomed to fail.

SCO tried to be the school bully. It ended up with no friends, no respect and nothing to show for it.

whitepaper title

The Perfect (Virtual) Marriage

Get consistent virtual machine storage savings of 50% (often as high as 90%) with virtually no performance impact with NetApp deduplication..
whitepaper title

Making Green IT a Reality

Customer Perspectives on the Impact of Storage Vendor Decisions on Power, Cooling, & Space in Enterprise Data Centers.

Top 20 storiesAll The Week’s HeadlinesArchiveSearch