Original URL: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/07/reaction_to_android/
As the reality of Google's Android mobile phone operating system starts to sink in, the industry is asking those not involved in the Open Handset Alliance why they decided to stay away.
FCC chairman Kevin Martin threw his support behind Android yesterday, saying in a statement: "I continue to believe that more openness, at the network, device, or application level, helps foster innovation and enhances consumers' freedom and choice in purchasing wireless service."
Google matters a lot in the USA, and to the FCC thanks to the interest it's shown in the upcoming 700MHz auction. In Europe, Nokia's opinion is considered more important.
Kari Tuutti, of Nokia's multimedia unit, told Reuters (http://www.reuters.com/article/technology-media-telco-SP/idUSL0617473720071107) that membership of the alliance is "not ruled out at all. If we would see this as beneficial we would think about taking part in it".
But Nokia has an enormous investment in Symbian, not to mention its own (http://maemo.org/) Linux project.
Ericsson certainly can't see the point in Android, telling Pocket-Lint (http://www.pocket-lint.co.uk/news/news.phtml/11159/12183/sony-ericsson-oha-android-google.phtml) that "we had a number of horses we could back and UIQ was the one we chose" - a strange comparison as UIQ is a graphical interface and application layer, and while Android may well have such a layer it's pitched to compete below the space where UIQ lives: against Symbian.
It's not easy to tell what Android does consist of. Details of the GUI, surely the most important part of a handset these days, aren't available and we don't even know what security or capabilities the platform will have beyond some woolly stuff (http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/06/google_android_limo_unworried/) about it being all things to all people.
So for companies to be so wholeheartedly supporting, or dismissing, the platform seems naive. Until we see some real lines of code (as we will be able to), or some devices, the clever money will wait and see what happens. ®
Hackers graft Google Android onto hardware (11 January 2008)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/01/11/google_android/
Google's Android - big name, big question on payment (9 January 2008)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/01/09/android_developer_choice/
Neo1973: long-distance contender to Apple and Google? (7 January 2008)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/01/07/mobile_review_neo1973/
LiPS Forum completes mobile Linux spec (11 December 2007)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/11/lips_spec/
When is Java not Java? (21 November 2007)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/21/dalvik/
Android: developer dream or Google cash machine? (16 November 2007)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/16/android_cash_machine/
Experts cast runes on Google phone security (15 November 2007)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/15/google_android_security/
Google puts $10m on the table for Android apps (12 November 2007)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/12/google_android_competition/
Nope, it's not a Gphone (6 November 2007)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/06/gphone_java_appliance/
Apocalypse Postponed: Google's dog didn't bark (6 November 2007)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/06/google_android_limo_unworried/
The internet in your pocket? (5 November 2007)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/05/open_handset_alliance/
Google's gives the world (another) Linux phone OS (5 November 2007)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/05/google_android_announcement/
Panic in smartphoneland (5 November 2007)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/05/google_phone_analysis/
Google phone-spotting reaches fever pitch (31 October 2007)
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/10/31/google_rumour_roundup/
© Copyright 2008